Will Reichard Kicking Stats By Distance Tell A Deeper Story
Will Reichard by distance
Will Reichard has been a strong long-range kicker with a clear split by distance: he is reliable from 30 to 49 yards, deadly from 50-plus in bursts, and much less frequently tested on very short attempts. In the 2025 regular season, his made-attempt breakdown shows a especially strong profile from 20-29 yards, 30-39 yards, 40-49 yards, and 50+ yards, including a 62-yard long as his season best.
Distance profile
The clearest way to judge kicking stats by distance is to separate the field-goal bands rather than look only at overall percentage. Reichard's 2025 regular-season line with Minnesota was 13-of-14 overall, with all 3 attempts from 20-29 yards made, 5-of-5 from 30-39, 1-of-1 from 40-49, and 4-of-5 from 50+ yards, which is the type of distribution that signals both range and stability.
| Season | 0-19 | 20-29 | 30-39 | 40-49 | 50+ | Long | Total FG | FG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 regular season | 0-0 | 5-5 | 6-7 | 5-7 | 8-11 | 58 | 24-30 | 80.0 |
| 2025 regular season | 0-0 | 3-3 | 5-5 | 1-1 | 4-5 | 62 | 13-14 | 93.0 |
That table shows why Reichard's profile looks more **elite** than uneven when examined by distance. The only caveat is sample size: a 14-attempt season can make one miss or one wind-affected game look more meaningful than it really is.
What the numbers say
Reichard's rookie 2024 regular season was more ordinary at a glance, with 24 made field goals on 30 tries and a 58-yard long, but the distance splits still showed a kicker who could handle mid- and deep-range work. In 2025, the trajectory improved sharply: 13 made field goals on 14 attempts, 12-for-12 on extra points, and a 62-yard conversion that tied the kind of elite range associated with the league's strongest leg groups.
In plain language, Reichard's long-distance value is the headline. He has not been asked to prove himself repeatedly from 55+ yards, but the evidence we do have points to a kicker who can extend drives with points from deep range instead of treating those snaps as low-probability punts.
- Short attempts: little evidence of weakness, but also little volume, because he has rarely needed 0-19-yard kicks.
- Mid-range attempts: strong and dependable from 20-49 yards across both seasons.
- Deep attempts: the standout trait, highlighted by 50-plus makes and a 62-yard long in 2025.
Elite or uneven?
The best answer is that Reichard is elite on the evidence available, though the sample is still young. His 2025 season percentage, combined with a 62-yard longest make and strong band-by-band results, suggests a kicker whose ceiling is high enough to change game plans and whose floor has looked safer than the average young specialist.
"Distance splits matter more than raw field-goal percentage because a kicker can look efficient without showing whether he can finish drives from 50-plus," is the right lens for Reichard's profile, and his recent numbers answer that question positively.
Where the "uneven" label can still come from is his rookie-year volatility. A 24-for-30 season is solid but not spotless, and any kicker with a handful of misses in a small sample can look streaky if the misses cluster in one stretch or in tough weather conditions.
Historical context
Reichard entered the NFL after building a reputation as a polished college kicker, and his pro results have mostly reinforced that reputation. By the end of 2025, he had already produced one of the more notable single-kicker deep-range seasons in the league, including a 62-yard field goal that became a signature moment for Minnesota.
The broader context is that NFL teams increasingly value kickers who can convert from 50+ yards without hesitation. Reichard's split results fit that modern mold, because his deep-range efficiency is not just a bonus; it changes fourth-down decisions, end-of-half strategy, and coaching confidence.
Why distance matters
Field-goal percentage alone can hide important details, especially for a kicker asked to attempt longer kicks. A kicker who goes 4-for-5 from 50+ yards is more valuable than one who pads the overall percentage with mostly short kicks, and Reichard's profile leans toward the former rather than the latter.
- His 50-plus-yard success rate in 2025 was the clearest sign of range.
- His 30-39 and 40-49-yard results show good mechanics and repeatable strike quality.
- His 62-yard long demonstrates that Minnesota can trust him beyond the traditional "safe" range.
That combination is exactly why his distance splits matter more than a single season average. A kicker can be "good" overall and still be limited from depth, but Reichard's deepest attempts suggest a legitimate weapon rather than a specialist merely surviving on short attempts.
How to read his season
If you are evaluating Will Reichard for fantasy, coaching, or player comparison purposes, the smartest approach is to treat his 2025 line as the most relevant snapshot while still remembering the rookie sample. The 2024 season showed competence; the 2025 season showed separation, with deeper makes and fewer misses.
His overall profile is best described as strong leg, improving accuracy, and useful range extension. That is not the profile of an uneven kicker in the ordinary sense, because the deeper he is asked to kick, the more his résumé looks like an asset rather than a liability.
Everything you need to know about Will Reichard Kicking Stats By Distance Tell A Deeper Story
Is Will Reichard good from long distance?
Yes. His 2025 distance splits and 62-yard long indicate that he is clearly capable from long range, especially from 50+ yards.
Is Will Reichard inconsistent by distance?
Not in the data currently available. The larger issue is limited volume, not clear weakness, because his band-by-band results are strong across the board.
What is his longest field goal?
His longest field goal in the available NFL data is 62 yards, hit in 2025.
Should teams trust him from 50-plus yards?
Yes, with the usual game-context caveat. His recent make rate from that range supports trust, especially compared with kickers who lack documented deep range.